Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 12: 741248, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1526766

ABSTRACT

Background: Hyperglycemia and obesity are associated with a worse prognosis in subjects with COVID-19 independently. Their interaction as well as the potential modulating effects of additional confounding factors is poorly known. Therefore, we aimed to identify and evaluate confounding factors affecting the prognostic value of obesity and hyperglycemia in relation to mortality and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to COVID-19. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted in two Hospitals from Italy (Bologna and Rome) and three from Spain (Barcelona and Girona) as well as subjects from Primary Health Care centers. Mortality from COVID-19 and risk for ICU admission were evaluated using logistic regression analyses and machine learning (ML) algorithms. Results: As expected, among 3,065 consecutive patients, both obesity and hyperglycemia were independent predictors of ICU admission. A ML variable selection strategy confirmed these results and identified hyperglycemia, blood hemoglobin and serum bilirubin associated with increased mortality risk. In subjects with blood hemoglobin levels above the median, hyperglycemic and morbidly obese subjects had increased mortality risk than normoglycemic individuals or non-obese subjects. However, no differences were observed among individuals with hemoglobin levels below the median. This was particularly evident in men: those with severe hyperglycemia and hemoglobin concentrations above the median had 30 times increased mortality risk compared with men without hyperglycemia. Importantly, the protective effect of female sex was lost in subjects with increased hemoglobin levels. Conclusions: Blood hemoglobin substantially modulates the influence of hyperglycemia on increased mortality risk in patients with COVID-19. Monitoring hemoglobin concentrations seem of utmost importance in the clinical settings to help clinicians in the identification of patients at increased death risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Hyperglycemia/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Hyperglycemia/blood , Incidence , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/blood , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Sex Factors , Spain , Survival Rate
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 104: 164-168, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-956031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Calcium is an essential ion for pathogen survival and virulence and is involved in the regulation of the inflammatory response. Hypocalcemia is a common laboratory finding in critically ill patients. Data regarding levels of calcium in SARS-CoV-2 infection is scarce. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who present with hypocalcemia could have a worse outcome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and included all patients who had any serum calcium measurement in the first 72h since hospital admission. The main objective was to investigate the relation of low serum calcium with adverse outcome, measured by the requirement of high oxygen support - defined as high flow nasal cannula oxygen, non-invasive mechanical ventilation and/or invasive ventilation - intensive care unit admission or death. RESULTS: A total of 316 patients were included in the study. Median age was 65 years (IQR 55-74); 65% were men. Hypocalcemia within 72h since hospital admission was present in 63% of patients. A higher number of patients in the hypocalcemia group required high oxygen support during hospitalization (49% vs 32%; p=0,01) and were admitted to the ICU (42% vs 26%; p=0,005). No differences in mortality were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hypocalcemia is frequent in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and can identify patients who will have a worse outcome. More studies are needed to understand the role of calcium metabolism in SARS-CoV-2 infection and to address the clinical implications and therapeutic interventions it might have.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Calcium/blood , Hypocalcemia/complications , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Aged , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/virology , Critical Illness , Female , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Hypocalcemia/physiopathology , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
3.
Acta Diabetol ; 58(3): 383-388, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-893283

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Spain has been one of the worst affected countries by the COVID-19 pandemic. A very strict lockdown at home was imposed with a tough restriction of mobility. We aimed to evaluate the impact of this exceptional scenario on glucose profile of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) prone to hypoglycaemia using sensor-augmented pump (SAP). METHODS: Patients with T1D prone to hypoglycaemia using SAP (640G Medtronic-Minimed®) for at least 6 months under the funding of a National Health Service were included in an observational, retrospective study. Data were collected in two periods: pre-lockdown (PL), February 23rd-March 7th and within lockdown (WL), April 1st to 14th 2020. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of time in target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL (TIR). Additional glucometric data and total daily insulin were also analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included: 33 women, age 46.17 ± 13.0 years and disease duration of 30.2 ± 12.0 years. TIR 70-180 mg/dL (67.6 ± 11.8 vs. 69.8 ± 12.0%), time > 180 (28.1 ± 13.6 vs. 25.5 ± 13.1%), time > 250 (6.9 ± 6.1 vs. 5.1 ± 4.8) and estimated HbA1c (6.94 ± 0.8 vs. 6.75 ± 0.7%) significantly improved (PL vs. WL, respectively, p < 0.05). Time in hypoglycaemia, coefficient of variation, sensor usage and total daily insulin dose remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Lockdown conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic may be managed successfully in terms of glycaemia control by population with DT1 prone to hypoglycaemia using SAP. The strict daily routine at home could probably explain the improvement in the time in glycemic target without increasing the time hypoglycaemia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Glycemic Control/methods , Hypoglycemia/blood , Insulin Infusion Systems , Pandemics , Quarantine , Adult , Aged , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 167: 108354, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-688958

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Spain has been one of the worst affected countries by the COVID-19 pandemic. A very strict lockdown at home was imposed with a tough restriction of mobility. We aimed to evaluate the impact of this exceptional scenario on glucose profile of patients with T1D prone to hypoglycemia using standalone continuous glucose monitoring. METHODS: Patients with T1D prone to hypoglycemia using multiple daily injections and either a Dexcom G5® or a Free Style Libre® CGM systems for at least 6 months under the funding of National Health Service were included in an observational, retrospective study. Data were collected in two periods: pre-lockdown (PL), February 23rd-March 7th and within lockdown (WL), April 1st-14th 2020. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of time in target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL (TIR). Additional glucometric data were also analysed. RESULTS: 92 patients were included: 40 women, age 42.8 ± 3.9 years, disease duration of 23.1 ± 12.6 years. Seventeen patients used Dexcom G5® and 75 Free Style Libre®. TIR 70-180 mg/dL (59.3 ± 16.2 vs 62.6 ± 15.2%), time > 180 (34.4 ± 18.0 vs 30.7 ± 16.9%), >250 (11.1 ± 10.6 vs 9.2 ± 9.7%) and Glucose Management Indicator (7.2 ± 0.8 vs 7.0 ± 0.8%) significantly improved (PL vs WL, respectively, p < 0.05). Time in hypoglycemia remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Lockdown conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic may be managed successfully in terms of glycemic control by population with T1D prone to hypoglycemia using CGM. The strict daily routine at home could probably explain the improvement in the time in glycemic target without increasing the time in hypoglycemia.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Communicable Disease Control , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Monitoring, Ambulatory , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Betacoronavirus , Blood Glucose , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/metabolism , Female , Humans , Injections , Insulin, Long-Acting/therapeutic use , Insulin, Short-Acting/therapeutic use , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology , State Medicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL